Debate surrounding a town river has reignited after a resident who spotted low water levels said he wants to see it "protected for future generations".
Mark Snowling has started a petition, which so far has 270 signatures, calling for "immediate action" to restore the River Brett in Hadleigh to its "former health and beauty".
It comes after low water levels were spotted in the river once again. Debate was sparked earlier this year when there was calls for an "open dialogue" with the Environment Agency regarding the sluice gates in Tinker's Lane.
"We believe they are going to leave these gates open all throughout the winter," said Mr Snowling, who has used the river frequently during his 55 years of living in the town and runs his own fishing shop.
"It is still the same problem with the water levels."
The issue with the water levels has meant that anglers looking to use the river for fishing are currently unable to do so.
Mr Snowling continued: "It is about protecting the river for future generations.
"I have got about eight to 10 youngsters who love fishing and at the moment they just can't do it. The way the river is now they just can't fish."
The gates are currently controlled by the Environment Agency, using permissive powers, in order to manage the risk of flooding.
A spokesperson for the authority said the plan for the gates is "subject to review" and that they are "sensitive to the views and concerns of others".
Mr Snowling added: "It goes a lot further than fishing.
"We are all up for working with members of the public to get this resolved."
The spokesperson for the Environment agency added: “Due to the current poor condition of the gates, at present we are operating the gates on a summer and winter setting.
“The current plan for the mill gates is subject to review and we are seeking to engage with the mill gate owner, once identified, to discuss works to improve their current condition, reducing risk of failure and improving operational safety.
"Other factors we consider when opening and closing the gates include river level, rainfall, soil moisture deficit and overall flood risk. Having a lower retained water level is the preferred option as it reduces flood risk and allows easier passage of fish and mammals.
"We are, however, sensitive to the views and concerns of others who enjoy and make use of the river for recreational activities.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel